I'm having trouble with std::to_string() in the following lambda function:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>


inline constexpr int a_global_constant { 12345 };


int main( )
{
    auto calculateMsgLength = [ ] ( ) consteval -> std::size_t
    {
        std::string str1 { "Part 1 " };
        std::string str2 { "Part 2 " };
        std::string msg { str1   str2 /*  std::to_string( a_global_constant )*/ };

        // The complete message should look like this: Part 1 Part 2 12345

        return msg.length( );
    };

    constexpr std::size_t msgLength { calculateMsgLength( ) };

    std::cout << "Message length == " << msgLength << '\n';
}

The above code doesn't compile on my GCC v11.2 therefore I had to use GCC (trunk) at the Compiler Explorer to compile it.

However, just by uncommenting the call to std::to_string() it doesn't compile:

<source>: In function 'int main()':
<source>:19:61: error: 'main()::<lambda()>' called in a constant expression
   19 |         constexpr std::size_t msgLength { calculateMsgLength( ) };
      |                                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
<source>:10:35: note: 'main()::<lambda()>' is not usable as a 'constexpr' function because:
   10 |         auto calculateMsgLength = [ ] ( ) consteval -> std::size_t
      |                                   ^
<source>:10:35: error: call to non-'constexpr' function 'std::string std::__cxx11::to_string(int)'
.
.
.

Is std::to_string going to be made constexpr in STL sometime in the near future? Or should I look for an alternative way for doing this? What is an alternative to std::to_string?

CodePudding user response：

Is std::to_string going to be made constexpr in STL sometime in the near future? Or should I look for an alternative way for doing this? What is an alternative to std::to_string?

I'm not aware of plans for std::to_string, but std::to_chars (and std::from_chars) for integral types will likely be constexpr in C 23 by way of P2291. Not sure why not std::to_string, at least for the integral types.

That said, if all you want is to convert a base-10 integer to a std::string at compile time, that's a fairly easy algorithm to write. The only tricky part is handling INT_MIN (since you can't just negate the argument if it's negative, that would overflow). But since this is a constexpr function, if you get it wrong, it's a compile error, which makes it a lot easier to get it right.

CodePudding user response：

compile-time evaluation is nice, but there are limits to what it can do especially based on what compiler you're using (as you somewhat mentioned). I would remove consteval. Even in doing so, this may be optimized at compile-time anyway.