I have a Rust library crate with code that is structured as follows:
pub struct Foo<X> {
x: X,
}
pub fn foo() -> Foo<u32> {
// ...
}
// private functions
In particular, while the lib uses different variants of Foo internally (e.g. Foo<u8>, Foo<u32>), Foo only occurs in the lib's public API as Foo<u32>.
Exposing the generic Foo as I currently do makes the lib's public API and its documentation unnecessarily complex: the user will never get a Foo from the library that is not a Foo<u32>. Therefore, I'd like to somehow only expose and publicly document Foo<u32> (ideally under a different, non-generic name, e.g. Bar) and make Foo private.
I've tried using a type alias (type Bar = Foo<u32>), but it seems that those are automatically expanded by cargo doc (and they also don't seem to have separate visibility).
I could probably copy the definition of Foo<X> and call it Bar instead, and then implement something like From<Foo<u32>> for Bar. However, my actual definition of Foo<X> is fairly complex, so I'd like to avoid that.
Is there another way to achieve my goal?
CodePudding user response:
You can expose the type from the parent module as follows:
mod prelude {
mod foo_mod {
pub struct Foo<X> {
x: X,
}
impl Foo<u32> {
pub fn foo() -> u32 {
32
}
}
impl Foo<u8> {
pub fn foo() -> u8 {
8
}
}
}
pub type FooBar = foo_mod::Foo<u32>;
}
fn main() {
use prelude::FooBar; // we can use this
use prelude::foo_mod::Foo; // we cannot use this
}
