I wrote a lightweight dictionary for a quick project with C, and I am getting the error: realloc(): invalid next size. I know this means my heap is corrupted somehow, but I'm not sure what I did wrong, it seems like my code is super simple.
The realloc always fails the fourth access, ie when dict->num_kvs = 4
Below is my code. It includes the dict library as well as the function that is using it. Any help would be much appreciated
Offending function:
int* get_letter_frequencies(char* stream) {
Dict* dict = Dict_initialize();
for(int i = 0; i < strlen(stream); i ) {
Dict_increment_or_add_key(dict, stream[i]);
}
int* to_return = Dict_get_values_array(dict);
Dict_free();
return to_return;
}
simple_dict.c (plus the struct definitions)
typedef struct kv_pair {
char key;
int value;
} KV_Pair;
typedef struct dict_ {
struct kv_pair* kv_pairs;
int num_kvs;
} Dict;
Dict* Dict_initialize() {
Dict* to_return = malloc(sizeof(Dict));
to_return->num_kvs = 0;
to_return->kv_pairs = NULL;
return to_return;
}
void Dict_free(Dict* dict) {
free(dict->kv_pairs);
free(dict);
}
int Dict_add_key(Dict* dict, char key) {
dict->num_kvs ;
printf("next size: %d\n", dict->num_kvs);
dict->kv_pairs = realloc(dict->kv_pairs, dict->num_kvs * sizeof(KV_Pair));
printf("realloc passed \n");
dict->kv_pairs[dict->num_kvs].value = 1;
return 0;
}
int Dict_find_key(Dict* dict, char key){
for(int i = 0; i < dict->num_kvs; i ) {
char cur_key = dict->kv_pairs[i].key;
if(cur_key == key) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
int Dict_increment_or_add_key(Dict* dict, char key) {
int key_index = Dict_find_key(dict, key);
if(key_index == -1) {
Dict_add_key(dict, key);
} else {
dict->kv_pairs[key_index].value ;
}
}
int* Dict_get_values_array (Dict* dict) {
int* to_return = malloc(dict->num_kvs * sizeof(int));
for(int i = 0; i < dict->num_kvs; i ) {
to_return[i] = dict->kv_pairs[i].value;
}
if(dict->num_kvs > 26) {
printf("more than 26 kvs: %d", dict->num_kvs);
}
return to_return;
}
CodePudding user response:
When you try to add the first element, you are incrementing dict->num_kvs to 1, then you allocate a single element. Then this line:
dict->kv_pairs[dict->num_kvs].value = 1;
It will try to write to the [1] element, instead of [0] element. This is out of bounds. You should use:
dict->kv_pairs[dict->num_kvs-1].value = 1;
PS: If you're using GCC or Clang, AddressSanitizer is a great tool to help you detect these type of bugs.
